WY: Bill Changing Sex Offender Access to School Grounds Passes Wyoming House

The Wyoming House of Representatives passed a bill on third reading on a vote of 33-26 during their Monday, Feb. 24 floor session which would modify rules pertaining to registered sex offenders’ access to schools. Full Article

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Uh that seems pointless and would logically be covered by already existing laws. I imagine it’s not exactly legal in any state to just loiter around a school. If someone does not have a legitimate reason for being somewhere I’m fairly sure they could face legal consequences for being there.

I find it difficult to fathom how a group of people with little to no knowledge of another person, other than a tainted branding, can make trivial decisions affecting not only the registrant’s life, but the lives of their families. I personally would have no problem following these people, putting a severe ass beating on them, and leaving them to think about what decisions they made put them in this condition.

Well if needle dick law makers never came up with a Registry in the first place there wouldn’t be such fear and panic in the effing communities like there is today.
The only threat here are policy makers. May God deal with them swiftly.
97% of your sex offender pawns do not reoffend……shake a different Tree or Beat a different fucking horse already 😡😡😡

Oh, man… In the 10 years that he’s been trying to pass this kind of bill there must have a been a ton of horrible things that happened! Right? Right? Bueller? Bueller?

No sex offenders permitted on school property except for certain reasons according to LAW!! For what reasons?

Gee, let me see what a threat sex offenders really are to the safety of school students on school grounds – how many times has a registrant (sex offender) been found trying to sexually abuse a student at a school? – Now, let me count how many times (non sex offender registrants) “school teachers” have been “CHARGED” with sexually abusing a student right on school grounds or elsewhere.

Maybe they should ban all school teachers from being on school property just in case also!!

Yup the above makes no sense but neither do these stupid laws. I am sure that many registrants will make it a point to go to a school just to sexually abuse a student – sarcasm here people!! And making a law to keep sex offenders at least 1,000 from a school will definitely make a difference in a situation that is not a situation.

How doesn’t any of this minimize risk or mitigate liability? It doesn’t.

Again, it’s the fear-inducing label that’s exploiting false and unwarranted concern.

All these laws stem from mothers that should have been charged with gross and contributory negligence, but we’re scapegoated instead for profit and political ambition.

Wyoming is an overpriced redneck culturaless wasteland. If I was on the registry there, I would jump in my pickup and head out of that state